{"id":3173,"date":"2026-10-28T14:29:28","date_gmt":"2026-10-28T08:59:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nevastech.com\/blog\/?p=3173"},"modified":"2026-10-28T14:29:28","modified_gmt":"2026-10-28T08:59:28","slug":"segregation-of-duties-in-dynamics-gp-the-conflicts-auditors-look-for","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nevastech.com\/blog\/segregation-of-duties-in-dynamics-gp-the-conflicts-auditors-look-for\/","title":{"rendered":"Segregation of Duties in Dynamics GP: The Conflicts Auditors Look For"},"content":{"rendered":"

Few things make a finance director more uncomfortable than an audit management letter that says: “Segregation of duties within the ERP system is inadequate.”<\/p>\n

It is one of the most common findings for organizations running Dynamics GP<\/a>. Not because GP lacks the tools, but because security was often set up quickly during implementation, with broad access to keep things moving, and then never revisited. Over the years, people change roles, small teams cover for each other, and access only ever grows.<\/p>\n

In this article, we will explain what segregation of duties means in practical terms, the specific conflicts auditors look for in GP, and how to tighten your controls without making daily work impossible.<\/p>\n

<\/span>What Segregation of Duties Means<\/span><\/h2>
\n
\n

Table of Contents<\/p>\nToggle<\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n